Difference between revisions of "Phi angle in CM frame for different runs"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
[[Image:phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_electron_sector_3_begin_run_27074_8_files.gif|400px]] | [[Image:phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_electron_sector_3_begin_run_27074_8_files.gif|400px]] | ||
[[Image:phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_electron_sector_4_begin_run_27074_8_files.gif|400px]]<br> | [[Image:phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_electron_sector_4_begin_run_27074_8_files.gif|400px]]<br> | ||
− | [[Image:phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_electron_sector_5_begin_run_27074_8_files.gif|400px]] | + | [[Image:phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_electron_sector_5_begin_run_27074_8_files.gif|400px]]<br> |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:pion_cosine_theta_in_cm_frame_vs_phi_angle_difference_in_cm_frame_with_cuts_8_files_using_rotation_around_phi_gamma_angle.gif|400px]] | ||
Revision as of 03:10, 23 June 2008
EC_total, vs , missing mass, vs
The angle is (0, 360).
electron sector | after correction | ||
1 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
6 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The angle is (0, 360).
I have applied the following cuts: EC_tot>140MeV, EC_inner>50Mev and nphe>2.5.
electron sector | after correction | |||
1 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
6 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
- phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_electron_sector
9 files. The cuts: EC_tot>140MeV, EC_inner>50Mev and nphe>2.5.
- phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_electron_sector
I used 27 files. The cut is applied on
- phi_angle_in_cm_frame_vs_pion_sector