Difference between revisions of "Analysis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
− | |||
Without any cuts we have 181018 entries. After using the following cut <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math> we are getting 127719 entries, which is about 70.55% of 181018. <br> | Without any cuts we have 181018 entries. After using the following cut <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math> we are getting 127719 entries, which is about 70.55% of 181018. <br> | ||
− | [[Image:Einner_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif]]<br> | + | [[Image:Einner_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif | 200 px]]<br> |
<math>EC_{inner}>0.08*p</math> | <math>EC_{inner}>0.08*p</math> | ||
− | [[Image:Etotal_over_P_using_inner_cut.gif]]<br> | + | [[Image:Etotal_over_P_using_inner_cut.gif | 200 px]]<br> |
After the cut on the energy deposited into inner part of electron calorimeter, number of entries decreases by 22%.<br> | After the cut on the energy deposited into inner part of electron calorimeter, number of entries decreases by 22%.<br> | ||
Line 23: | Line 22: | ||
Both cuts are applied<br> | Both cuts are applied<br> | ||
− | [[Image:Etotal_over_P_using_both_cuts.gif]]<br> | + | [[Image:Etotal_over_P_using_both_cuts.gif | 200 px]]<br> |
In case of using the cuts of the total deposited energy and the eneregy deposited into inner calorimeter number of entries decreases ~36% <br> | In case of using the cuts of the total deposited energy and the eneregy deposited into inner calorimeter number of entries decreases ~36% <br> | ||
− | [[Image:Einner_over_P_using_both_cuts.gif]]<br> | + | [[Image:Einner_over_P_using_both_cuts.gif | 200 px]]<br> |
==Pion== | ==Pion== |
Revision as of 15:49, 6 August 2007
Particle Identification
Electron
Cuts
Without any cuts we have 181018 entries. After using the following cut we are getting 127719 entries, which is about 70.55% of 181018.
After the cut on the energy deposited into inner part of electron calorimeter, number of entries decreases by 22%.
Both cuts are applied
In case of using the cuts of the total deposited energy and the eneregy deposited into inner calorimeter number of entries decreases ~36%