Difference between revisions of "Analysis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Cuts) |
(→Cuts) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[Image:Etotal_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif]]<br> | [[Image:Etotal_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif]]<br> | ||
− | Without any cuts we have 181018 entries. After using the following cut <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math> we are getting 127719 entries, which is about 70.55% of 181018 | + | Without any cuts we have 181018 entries. After using the following cut <math>EC_{tot}>0.2*p</math> we are getting 127719 entries, which is about 70.55% of 181018. <br> |
+ | |||
[[Image:Einner_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif]]<br> | [[Image:Einner_over_P_using_tot_cut.gif]]<br> | ||
Line 32: | Line 33: | ||
[[Image:Etotal_over_P_using_inner_cut.gif]]<br> | [[Image:Etotal_over_P_using_inner_cut.gif]]<br> | ||
+ | After the cut on the energy deposited into inner part of electron calorimeter, number of entries decreases by 22%.<br> | ||
[[Image:Einner_over_P_using_inner_cut.gif]]<br> | [[Image:Einner_over_P_using_inner_cut.gif]]<br> | ||
Line 37: | Line 39: | ||
[[Image:Etotal_over_P_using_both_cuts.gif]]<br> | [[Image:Etotal_over_P_using_both_cuts.gif]]<br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | In case of using the cuts of the total deposited energy and the enregy deposited into inner calorimeter number of entries decreases ~36% <br> | ||
[[Image:Einner_over_P_using_both_cuts.gif]]<br> | [[Image:Einner_over_P_using_both_cuts.gif]]<br> |
Revision as of 04:31, 3 August 2007
Particle Identification
Electron
Pion
Quality Checks
Rates
Asymmetries
Cuts
Without any cuts we have 181018 entries. After using the following cut we are getting 127719 entries, which is about 70.55% of 181018.
After the cut on the energy deposited into inner part of electron calorimeter, number of entries decreases by 22%.
Both cuts are applied
In case of using the cuts of the total deposited energy and the enregy deposited into inner calorimeter number of entries decreases ~36%