Difference between revisions of "DOE EPSCoR Proposal"

From New IAC Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
== Year 3 ==
 
== Year 3 ==
# Test design configuration from Genetic Algorithm at the IAC
+
# Conceptual Positron source design level 1 (CD1)
#measure tungsten converter target performance as function of IAC beam current
 
 
# IAC beam is x 40 less power than what will be needed at JLAB
 
# IAC beam is x 40 less power than what will be needed at JLAB
  

Revision as of 22:27, 14 June 2007

A Positron Source for JLAB

Year 1

  1. Install positron beam line.
  2. Check positron productions efficiency simulations for 10-20 MeV electrons on Tungsten Target (expecing 17 nA of positrons for a 10mA electron beam at E=?)
  3. Investigate differences between simulation and data, most likely need another week of beam to change configuration

Year 2

  1. Measure production efficiency for different Tungsten converter target thicknesses (100 microns -> 1mm in 100 micron steps)
  2. Measure positron emmitance and compare to simulation predictions
  3. Measure brightness as a function of quad setting (quads change emmitance)
  4. measure positron output as a function of beam current
  5. Begin designing tungsten converter capable of handling high heat load
  6. CEBAF can accept particles into acceleration stage as long as ΔEE103
  7. Electrons are injected at 500 MeV (1 GeV) for a 6 GeV (12 GeV) CEBAF. Currently ΔEE105

Year 3

  1. Conceptual Positron source design level 1 (CD1)
  2. IAC beam is x 40 less power than what will be needed at JLAB

Parts list

  1. FC $5k 400 W max power
  2. harp scanner $20k