Difference between revisions of "Forest UCM Osc HookesLaw"
(52 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Let consider the case where an object is oscillating about a point of stability <math>(x_0)</math> | Let consider the case where an object is oscillating about a point of stability <math>(x_0)</math> | ||
− | A Taylor expansion of the Potential function U(x) about the | + | A Taylor expansion of the Potential function U(x) about the equilibrium point <math>(x_0)</math> is |
: <math>U(x) = U(x_0) \; + \; \left . \frac{\partial U}{\partial x} \right |_{x=x_0} (x-x_0) \; + \; \frac{1}{2!}\left . \frac{\partial^2 U}{\partial x^2} \right |_{x=x_0} (x-x_0)^2 \; + \; \frac{1}{3!}\left . \frac{\partial^3 U}{\partial x^3} \right |_{x=x_0} (x-x_0)^3 \; + \dots </math> | : <math>U(x) = U(x_0) \; + \; \left . \frac{\partial U}{\partial x} \right |_{x=x_0} (x-x_0) \; + \; \frac{1}{2!}\left . \frac{\partial^2 U}{\partial x^2} \right |_{x=x_0} (x-x_0)^2 \; + \; \frac{1}{3!}\left . \frac{\partial^3 U}{\partial x^3} \right |_{x=x_0} (x-x_0)^3 \; + \dots </math> | ||
− | Further consider the case the the potential is symmetric about the | + | Further consider the case the the potential is symmetric about the equilibrium point <math>(x_0)</math> |
− | at the | + | at the equilibrium point |
:<math>\left . \frac{\partial U}{\partial x} \right |_{x=x_0} = 0 </math>: Force = 0 at equilibrium | :<math>\left . \frac{\partial U}{\partial x} \right |_{x=x_0} = 0 </math>: Force = 0 at equilibrium | ||
− | + | in order to have stable equilibrium | |
− | :<math>\left . \frac{\partial^{2n-1} U}{\partial x^{2n-1}} \right |_{x=x_0} = 0 </math>: | + | :<math>\left . \frac{\partial^{2} U}{\partial x^{2}} \right |_{x=x_0} > 0 </math>: stable equilibirium |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | also the odd (2n-1) terms must be zero in order to have stable equilibrium for a symmetric potential (the potential needs to be a max at the end points of the motion). | ||
+ | |||
+ | :<math>\left . \frac{\partial^{2n-1} U}{\partial x^{2n-1}} \right |_{x=x_0} = 0 </math>: | ||
and the leading term is just a constant which can be dropped by redefining the zero point of the potential | and the leading term is just a constant which can be dropped by redefining the zero point of the potential | ||
Line 48: | Line 53: | ||
if we make the following definitions | if we make the following definitions | ||
− | : <math> \left . \frac{\partial^2 U}{\partial x^2} \right |_{x=x_0} | + | : <math> \left . \frac{\partial^2 U}{\partial x^2} \right |_{x=x_0} \; = k </math> |
− | : <math>U(x) = \frac{1}{6} \left . \frac{\partial^4 U}{\partial x^4} \right |_{x=x_0} | + | : <math>U(x) = \frac{1}{6} \left . \frac{\partial^4 U}{\partial x^4} \right |_{x=x_0} \; = \epsilon </math> |
− | and that the | + | and that the equilibrium point is located at the orgin |
:<math>x_0 = 0</math> | :<math>x_0 = 0</math> | ||
Line 72: | Line 77: | ||
Returning back to the conservation of energy equation | Returning back to the conservation of energy equation | ||
− | :<math> E = \frac{m}{2} \dot {x}^2 | + | :<math> E = T + U = \frac{m}{2} \dot {x}^2 + \frac{1}{2}kx^2 \; + \; \frac{1}{4}\epsilon x^4 \; + \dots </math> |
Lets consider only the first term in the expansion of the potential U(x) | Lets consider only the first term in the expansion of the potential U(x) | ||
− | :<math> E = \frac{m}{2} \dot {x}^2 | + | :<math> E = \frac{m}{2} \dot {x}^2 + \frac{1}{2}kx^2 </math> |
− | :<math> \frac{dE}{dt} = \frac{m}{2} 2 \dot {x} \ddot x | + | :<math> \frac{dE}{dt} = \frac{m}{2} 2 \dot {x} \ddot x + \frac{1}{2}k2 x \dot x = 0 </math> energy is constant with time |
:<math> m\ddot x =-kx </math> energy is constant with time | :<math> m\ddot x =-kx </math> energy is constant with time | ||
Line 97: | Line 102: | ||
2.) The work done is independent of path ( <math>\vec \nabla \times \vec F = 0</math> in 1-D and 3-D) | 2.) The work done is independent of path ( <math>\vec \nabla \times \vec F = 0</math> in 1-D and 3-D) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
[[Forest_UCM_Osc#Hooke.27s_Law]] | [[Forest_UCM_Osc#Hooke.27s_Law]] |
Latest revision as of 14:29, 4 October 2021
Hooke's Law
Derivation
Equation of Motion from Cons of Energy
In the previous chapter Forest_UCM_Energy_Line1D, we saw how the equations of motion could from the requirement that Energy be conserved.
in 1-D
Let consider the case where an object is oscillating about a point of stability
A Taylor expansion of the Potential function U(x) about the equilibrium point
is
Further consider the case the the potential is symmetric about the equilibrium point
at the equilibrium point
- : Force = 0 at equilibrium
in order to have stable equilibrium
- : stable equilibirium
also the odd (2n-1) terms must be zero in order to have stable equilibrium for a symmetric potential (the potential needs to be a max at the end points of the motion).
- :
and the leading term is just a constant which can be dropped by redefining the zero point of the potential
This leaves us with
if we make the following definitions
and that the equilibrium point is located at the orgin
Then
Since we began this derivation with the assumption that energy was conserved then the force must be conservative such that
or this 1-D force can be written as
Interpretation (Hooke's law)
Returning back to the conservation of energy equation
Lets consider only the first term in the expansion of the potential U(x)
- energy is constant with time
- energy is constant with time
A Force exerted by a spring is proportional to the spring displacement from equilibrium and is directed towards restoring the equilibrium condition. (a linear restoring force).
In 1-D this force may be written as
While the above was derived from the assumption of conservation of energy we can apply our two tests for conservative forces as a double check:
1.) The force only depends on position.
2.) The work done is independent of path (
in 1-D and 3-D)