Difference between revisions of "TF InclusiveDeltaDoverD"
(27 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Delta_D_over_D]] | [[Delta_D_over_D]] | ||
− | <math> F_1(x) \equiv \frac{1}{2} \sum_q | + | <math> q_i(x) \equiv q_i^{\parallel}(x) + q_i^{\perp}(x)</math> |
+ | |||
+ | <math> \Delta q_i(x) \equiv q_i^{\parallel}(x) - q_i^{\perp}(x)</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <math> F_1(x) \equiv \frac{1}{2} \sum_q e_i^2 q_i(x) </math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | using the above definition to define the proton and neutron unpolarized structure function : | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math> F_1^p(x) \equiv \frac{1}{2} \sum_q e_i^2 q_i^p(x) = \frac{1}{2}\left [ \left( \frac{2}{3} \right)^2 u^p(x)+ \left( \frac{-1}{3} \right)^2 d^p(x)\right ] =\frac{1}{2} \left [\frac{4}{9}u^p(x) + \frac{1}{9}d^p(x)\right ]</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math> F_1^n(x) \equiv \frac{1}{2} \sum_q e_i^2 q_i^p(x) = \frac{1}{2}\left [ \left( \frac{2}{3} \right)^2 u^n(x)+ \left( \frac{-1}{3} \right)^2 d^n(x)\right ] =\frac{1}{2} \left [\frac{4}{9}u^n(x) + \frac{1}{9}d^n(x)\right ]</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ;The above is true within the framework of the constituent quark model when in the valence quark region <math>\left ( x_bj>0.5 \right )</math> where the more massive quarks are ignored as well as anti-quarks | ||
+ | |||
+ | Using Isospin symmetry | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>u(x) \equiv u^p(x)\equiv d^n(x) \;\;\;\;\;</math> and <math>\;\;\;\;\;d(x) \equiv d^p(x)\equiv u^n(x) </math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | The unpolarized structure functions for the proton and neutron may be written as | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math> F_1^p(x) =\frac{1}{2} \left [\frac{4}{9}u(x) + \frac{1}{9}d(x)\right ] \;\;\;\;\;</math> <math> F_1^n(x)=\frac{1}{2} \left [\frac{4}{9}d(x) + \frac{1}{9}u(x)\right ]</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | similarly for the polarized structure function | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math> g_1(x) \equiv \frac{1}{2} \sum_q e_i^2 \Delta q_i(x) </math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <math> g_1^p(x) =\frac{1}{2} \left [\frac{4}{9} \Delta u(x) + \frac{1}{9} \Delta d(x)\right ] \;\;\;\;\;</math> <math> g_1^n(x)=\frac{1}{2} \left [\frac{4}{9} \Delta d(x) + \frac{1}{9} \Delta u(x)\right ]</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <math> A_1(x,Q^2) \equiv \frac{\sigma_{1/2}^T - \sigma_{3/2}^T}{\sigma_{1/2}^T - \sigma_{3/2}^T} = \frac{g_1(x,Q^2) - \frac{Q^2}{\nu^2} g_2(x,Q^2)}{F_1(x,Q^2)} \approx \frac{g_1(x,Q^2)}{F_1(x,Q^2)}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | In the non-relativistic constituent quark model | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math> A_1^p = \frac{4\Delta u + \Delta d}{4u+d} \;\;\;\;\ A_1^n = \frac{\Delta u + 4\Delta d}{u+4d}</math> <ref>https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9809255 PHYSICAL REVIEW D, VOLUME 59, 034013 Valence quark spin distribution functions Nathan Isgur , https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0411005 The Spin Structure of the Proton Steven D. Bass Rev.Mod.Phys.77:1257-1302,2005</ref> | ||
+ | |||
+ | One can use the two equations above and solve for the polarized quark distributions assuming the unpolarized are known and get , for example | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math> \frac{\Delta d}{d} = \frac{4}{15} \left ( 4 + \frac{u}{d}\right ) A_1^n + \frac{1}{15} \left ( 1 + 4\frac{u}{d}\right ) A_1^p</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Then using the above approximation for A_1 | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math> \frac{\Delta d}{d} = \frac{4}{15} \left ( 4 + \frac{u}{d}\right ) \frac{g_1^n}{F_1^n} + \frac{1}{15} \left ( 1 + 4\frac{u}{d}\right ) \frac{g_1^p}{F_1^p}</math> | ||
+ | |||
<math>g_1^d \approx \left ( 1 - 1.5 \omega_D \right ) \left ( g_1^n + g_1^p \right )</math><ref> Eq. 28 from https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.07877 which is based on https://arxiv.org/abs/0809.4308</ref> | <math>g_1^d \approx \left ( 1 - 1.5 \omega_D \right ) \left ( g_1^n + g_1^p \right )</math><ref> Eq. 28 from https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.07877 which is based on https://arxiv.org/abs/0809.4308</ref> |
Latest revision as of 19:03, 22 September 2018
using the above definition to define the proton and neutron unpolarized structure function :
- The above is true within the framework of the constituent quark model when in the valence quark region where the more massive quarks are ignored as well as anti-quarks
Using Isospin symmetry
and
The unpolarized structure functions for the proton and neutron may be written as
similarly for the polarized structure function
In the non-relativistic constituent quark model
https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9809255 PHYSICAL REVIEW D, VOLUME 59, 034013 Valence quark spin distribution functions Nathan Isgur , https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0411005 The Spin Structure of the Proton Steven D. Bass Rev.Mod.Phys.77:1257-1302,2005</ref>
<ref>One can use the two equations above and solve for the polarized quark distributions assuming the unpolarized are known and get , for example
Then using the above approximation for A_1
<ref> Eq. 28 from https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.07877 which is based on https://arxiv.org/abs/0809.4308</ref>
<references />