Difference between revisions of "170049 1% Se Soil Mixture Analysis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
|| || 5/23/17 ||5/25/17 || 5/27/17|| 5/29/17 || 5/30/17 | || || 5/23/17 ||5/25/17 || 5/27/17|| 5/29/17 || 5/30/17 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | ||Thin Window Histogram || | + | ||Thin Window Histogram || [[File:170049 FrontOuterFoil ThinWindow 5 23 17.png|100px]] || [[File:170049 FrontOuterFoil ThinWindow 5 25 17.png|100px]] || [[File:170049 FrontOuterFoil ThinWindow 5 27 17.png|100px]] || [[File:170049 FrontOuterFoil ThinWindow 5 29 17.png|100px]] || [[File:170049 FrontOuterFoil ThinWindow 5 30 17.png|100px]] |
|- | |- | ||
||Original Histogram || | ||Original Histogram || |
Revision as of 21:31, 22 February 2018
Below is the information for the target
Front Outer Nickel Foil: 3.4274g
Outer Se: 0.0914g
Soil: 10.240g
Inner Front Foil: 1.8672g
Inner Rear Foil: 1.7220g
Inner Se: 0.0954g
Rear Outer Foil: 3.4887g
Below is a table with the data that is to be analyzed for the mixture:
Below is the table for the pure selenium sample which was outside the aluminum cylinder
Nickel Foil Information
For the nickel I have been using counting statistics (
) to find the error in the signal. This is due to the fact that I can pin down the half life within uncertainty using this type of error.Below is a table for the front outer nickel foil that was used in the sample.
Below is the table for the rear outer foil: