Difference between revisions of "LB 170048 Nickel Foil Consistency Check"
(25 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | The activity of Nickel foils from the front and rear of the sample container were compared. Below is a table of pictures and information from ROOT sessions. For each of these, the spectrum was weighted by the inverse of the mass. For the front foil the mass was 1.3310g and for the rear foil the mass was 1.2196g. If the background subtraction is negative, take the mean of the two numbers. | |
To find the error in the background, the expanded window's background was subtracted from the original window's background. The signal was found by integrating the gaussian over the original window with an adjusted amplitude, which has been background subtracted and fed into mathematica. | To find the error in the background, the expanded window's background was subtracted from the original window's background. The signal was found by integrating the gaussian over the original window with an adjusted amplitude, which has been background subtracted and fed into mathematica. | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|| || 5/23/17 || 5/26/17 || 5/29/17 || 5/30/17 | || || 5/23/17 || 5/26/17 || 5/29/17 || 5/30/17 | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | ||Original Window || [[File:170048 003 FrontFoil Pos70 5 23 17.png|100px]] || [[File:170048 003 FrontFoil | + | ||Original Window || [[File:170048 003 FrontFoil Pos70 5 23 17.png|100px]] || [[File:170048 003 FrontFoil 5 26 17.png|100px]] || [[File:170048 003 FrontFoil Pos10 5 29 17.png|100px]] || [[File:170048 003 FrontFoil Pos10 5 30 17.png|100px]] |
|- | |- | ||
||Expanded Window || [[File:170048 003 FrontFoil Pos70 ExpWindow 5 23 17.png|100px]] || [[File:170048 003 FrontFoil Pos30 5 26 17 ExpWindow.png|100px]] || [[File:170048 003 FrontFoil Pos10 5 29 17 ExpWindow.png|100px]] || [[File:170048 003 FrontFoil Pos10 5 30 17 ExpWindow.png|100px]] | ||Expanded Window || [[File:170048 003 FrontFoil Pos70 ExpWindow 5 23 17.png|100px]] || [[File:170048 003 FrontFoil Pos30 5 26 17 ExpWindow.png|100px]] || [[File:170048 003 FrontFoil Pos10 5 29 17 ExpWindow.png|100px]] || [[File:170048 003 FrontFoil Pos10 5 30 17 ExpWindow.png|100px]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | ||Background || | + | ||Original Background (Integrated) || 388.8 +/- 63.2 || 297.2 +/- 72.8 || 1145.6 +/- 115.2 || 1024 +/- 92 |
|- | |- | ||
− | || | + | ||Expanded Window Background (Integrated) ||307.9 +/- 35.8 || 411.80 +/- 42.90 || 1058 +/- 68 ||681.4 +/- 53.4 |
|- | |- | ||
− | || | + | ||BG Average || 348.35 +/- 72.64 || 354.5 +/- 84.5 || 1101.8 +/- 133.77 || 852.7 +/- 106.37 |
|- | |- | ||
− | || | + | ||Integral of Original Window || 1.312e^4 || 1.777e^4 || 2.479e^4 || 1.69e^4 |
|- | |- | ||
− | ||.dat file entry || 13.0745843 +/- | + | ||Integral of Expanded Window || 1.32e^4 || 1.792e^4 || 2.506e^4 || 1.704e^4 |
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Integral Difference || 80 || 150 || 270 || 140 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Counts || 13120 +/- 80 || 17770 +/- 150 || 24790 +/- 270 || 16900 +/- 140 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Signal (BG subtracted Counts) || 12771.65 +/- 108.06 || 17415.5 +/- 172.16 || 23688.2 +/- 301.32 || 16047.3 +/- 175.78 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Efficiency || 8.9e^-5 +/- 1.8e^-6 || 4.22e^-4 +/- 4.671e^-6 || 0.0031 +/- 3.71e^-5 ||0.0031 +/- 3.71e^-5 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||.dat file entry || 13.0745843 +/- 0.0211725 || 11.82996708 +/- 0.0148404 || 10.14076001 +/- 0.0174652 || 9.751499466 +/- 0.0162239 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | The information for the rear foil is shown below | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| border="3" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" | ||
+ | || || 5/23/17 || 5/26/17 || 5/29/17 || 5/30/17 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Original Window || [[File:170048 004 RearFoil 5 23 17.png|100px]] || [[File:170048 004 RearFoil Pos30 5 26 17.png|100px]] || [[File:170048 004 RearFoil Pos10 5 29 17.png|100px]] || [[File:170048 004 RearFoil Pos10 5 30 17.png|100px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Expanded Window || [[File:170048 004 RearFoil Pos70 5 23 17 Expanded.png|100px]] || [[File:170048 004 RearFoil Pos30 5 26 17 Expanded.png|100px]] || [[File:170048 004 RearFoil Pos10 5 29 17 Expanded.png|100px]] || [[File:170048 004 RearFoil Pos10 5 30 17 Expanded.png|100px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Original Background (Integrated) || 344.16 +/- 53.44 || 273.2 +/- 60.16 || 1164.8 +/- 105.6 || 718.32 +/- 72 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Expanded Window Background (Integrated) ||262.2 +/-31.5 || 386.5 +/- 39.5 || 889.7 +/- 61.3 ||488.3 +/- 43.3 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||BG Average || 303.18 +/- 62.03 || 329.85 +/- 71.97 || 1027.25 +/- 122.10 || 603.31 +/- 84.02 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Integral of Original Window || 1.036e^4 || 1.369e^4 || 2.257e^4 || 1.257e^4 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Integral of Expanded Window || 1.042e^4 || 1.38e^4 || 2.278e^4 || 1.267e^4 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Integral Difference || 60 || 110 || 210 || 100 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Counts || 10360 +/- 60 || 13690 +/- 110 || 22570 +/- 210 || 12670 +/- 100 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Signal (BG subtracted Counts) || 10056.82 +/- 86.30 || 13360.15 +/- 131.45 || 21542.75 +/- 249.92 || 12066.69 +/- 130.61 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||Efficiency || 8.9e^-5 +/- 1.8e^-6 || 4.22e^-4 +/- 4.671e^-6 || 0.0031 +/- 3.71e^-5 ||0.0031 +/- 3.71e^-5 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ||.dat file entry || 12.83634845 +/- 0.0219699 || 11.56523893 +/- 0.0148095 || 9.934640683 +/- 0.0166677 || 9.469395687 +/- 0.0161365 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | The plots for the half lives are shown below | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:170048 003 HL Plot.png|200px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:170048 004 HL Plot.png|200px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now we can find the initial activity of each of the foils. There is no time correction needed for 170048-003 as its first measurement is set to t = 0. So we can find the activity with | ||
+ | |||
+ | The activity of the front foil (170048-003) is 428347.47 +/- 6766.18 Hz | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now since the rear foil's time stamp has the initial measurement of the front foil as 0 on the t-axis, we shouldn't need to time correct this either. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The activity of the rear foil (170048-004) is 385325.23 +/- 6487.72 Hz | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Note that these are not statistically the same, but the ratio between the activities of the front and rear nickel foil is 0.80 +/- 0.02 | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note that 170048 was a 10% soil and selenium mixture. This means that there would be more soil in the aluminum cylinder to attenuate the beam. This could be a reason why the ratio isn't closer to 1. |
Latest revision as of 20:21, 21 February 2018
The activity of Nickel foils from the front and rear of the sample container were compared. Below is a table of pictures and information from ROOT sessions. For each of these, the spectrum was weighted by the inverse of the mass. For the front foil the mass was 1.3310g and for the rear foil the mass was 1.2196g. If the background subtraction is negative, take the mean of the two numbers.
To find the error in the background, the expanded window's background was subtracted from the original window's background. The signal was found by integrating the gaussian over the original window with an adjusted amplitude, which has been background subtracted and fed into mathematica.
The information for the rear foil is shown below
The plots for the half lives are shown below
Now we can find the initial activity of each of the foils. There is no time correction needed for 170048-003 as its first measurement is set to t = 0. So we can find the activity with
The activity of the front foil (170048-003) is 428347.47 +/- 6766.18 Hz
Now since the rear foil's time stamp has the initial measurement of the front foil as 0 on the t-axis, we shouldn't need to time correct this either.
The activity of the rear foil (170048-004) is 385325.23 +/- 6487.72 Hz
Note that these are not statistically the same, but the ratio between the activities of the front and rear nickel foil is 0.80 +/- 0.02
Note that 170048 was a 10% soil and selenium mixture. This means that there would be more soil in the aluminum cylinder to attenuate the beam. This could be a reason why the ratio isn't closer to 1.