Difference between revisions of "2NCorr Forward Detectors"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Production Analysis| go back]] | [[Production Analysis| go back]] | ||
| − | In order to check if reasonable | + | There were concerns over the usefulness of events in the forward detectors, since there is no separation between photons and neutrons in the ToF spectrum. However, all accidentals, whether a result of noise, neutrons, photons, ect, can be subtracted out by using the different pulse data. In order to check if reasonable results can be extracted from events in the forward detectors, I looked at the two-neutron opening angle distributions with the requirement that one of the neutrons was detected by detector 30, and detector 330. The result is a opening angle distribution that is quit similar to the distribution produced by the rest of the detector array. |
[[File:2NCorrForwardDetCompare.png|650px]] | [[File:2NCorrForwardDetCompare.png|650px]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 21:50, 14 February 2018
There were concerns over the usefulness of events in the forward detectors, since there is no separation between photons and neutrons in the ToF spectrum. However, all accidentals, whether a result of noise, neutrons, photons, ect, can be subtracted out by using the different pulse data. In order to check if reasonable results can be extracted from events in the forward detectors, I looked at the two-neutron opening angle distributions with the requirement that one of the neutrons was detected by detector 30, and detector 330. The result is a opening angle distribution that is quit similar to the distribution produced by the rest of the detector array.
