Difference between revisions of "4-vectors"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Since
is nothing more than a dot product of a vector with itself, we should expect the components of the indices to follow a similar relationship.
Where
Where
is the Lorentz transformation matrix for motion in the z direction.
Where
Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
− | <center><math>\mathbf | + | <center><math>\mathbf R_1 \cdot \mathbf R_2 = x_0^2-(x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2)</math></center> |
+ | |||
Line 121: | Line 122: | ||
− | <center><math>\mathbf R_1 \cdot \mathbf R_2 = x_{0_1}x_{0_2}-( | + | |
+ | <center><math>\mathbf R_1 \cdot \mathbf R_2 = x_{0_1}x_{0_2}-(x_{1_1}x_{1_2}+x_{2_1}x_{2_2}+x_{3_1}x_{3_2})</math></center> | ||
+ | |||
This is useful in that it shows that the scalar product of two 4-vectors is an invariant since the time-space interval is an invariant. | This is useful in that it shows that the scalar product of two 4-vectors is an invariant since the time-space interval is an invariant. |
Revision as of 22:01, 8 June 2017
4-vectors
Using index notation, the time and space coordinates can be combined into a single "4-vector"
, that has units of length(i.e. ct is a distance).
We can express the space time interval using the index notation
The change in signs in the covariant term,
from the contravarient term
Comes from the Minkowski metric
Similarly, for two different 4-vectors,
This is useful in that it shows that the scalar product of two 4-vectors is an invariant since the time-space interval is an invariant.
Using the Lorentz transformations and the index notation,
This can be expressed in matrix form as
Letting the indices run from 0 to 3, we can write
The Lorentz transformations are also invariant in that they are just a rotation, i.e. Det . The inner product is preserved,