Difference between revisions of "4-vectors"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Since
is nothing more than a dot product of a vector with itself, we should expect the components of the indices to follow a similar relationship.
Where
Where
is the Lorentz transformation matrix for motion in the z direction.
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
− | Using index notation, the time and space coordinates can be combined into a single "4-vector" <math>x^{\mu},\ \mu=0,\ 1,\ 2,\ 3</math>, that has units of length | + | Using index notation, the time and space coordinates can be combined into a single "4-vector" <math>x^{\mu},\ \mu=0,\ 1,\ 2,\ 3</math>, that has units of length(i.e. ct is a distance). |
− | <center><math>\begin{bmatrix} | + | <center><math>\mathbf{R} \equiv |
+ | \begin{bmatrix} | ||
x^0 \\ | x^0 \\ | ||
x^1 \\ | x^1 \\ |
Revision as of 15:31, 6 June 2017
4-vectors
Using index notation, the time and space coordinates can be combined into a single "4-vector"
, that has units of length(i.e. ct is a distance).
We can express the space time interval using the index notation
The change in signs in the covariant term,
from the contravarient term
Comes from the Minkowski metric
This is useful in that it shows that the "dot product" of two 4-vectors is an invariant since the time-space interval is an invariant.
Using the Lorentz transformations and the index notation,
This can be expressed in matrix form as
Letting the indices run from 0 to 3, we can write