Difference between revisions of "Niowave 9-2015"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
− | A comparison of the positron production efficiency predictions made by MCNPX and G4beamline (GEANT4) | + | Simulations were performed to predict the efficiency of producing positrons using a Lead-Bismuth target and a 10 MeV incident electron. MCNPX and GEANT4 were used to predict this efficiency in an effort to benchmark the results. Niowave performed a simulation using MCNPX and ISU used GEANT4. A comparison of the positron production efficiency predictions made by MCNPX and G4beamline (GEANT4) indicates that they were consistent. |
Revision as of 21:24, 12 April 2016
Progress Report, September 2015
Simulations were performed to predict the efficiency of producing positrons using a Lead-Bismuth target and a 10 MeV incident electron. MCNPX and GEANT4 were used to predict this efficiency in an effort to benchmark the results. Niowave performed a simulation using MCNPX and ISU used GEANT4. A comparison of the positron production efficiency predictions made by MCNPX and G4beamline (GEANT4) indicates that they were consistent.
PbBi Thickness (mm) | #positrons/million electrons (G4Beamline) | #positrons/million electrons (MCNPX) |
1 | 1138,1154,1097,1159,1125 =1135 | 251091 |
1.5 | 1668,1701,1639, 1644, 1628=1656 | 291728 |
2 | 1937,1930,1851,1874,1945=1907 | 421984 |
3 | 1889,1821,1852,1809,1859=1846 | 321986 |
4 | 1726,1696,1673,1693,1681=1694 | 201858 |
5 | 1566,1543,1546,1625,1566=1569 | 331646 |
6 | 1549, 1486,1564,1545,1452=1520 | 501541 |
7 | 1462,1327, 1407,1489 ,1477=1432 | 671541 |
8 | 1289, 1335,1280, 1271, 1280 = 1291 | 25|
10 | 1141,1241, 1199, 1202, 1148 =1186 | 421216 |
The spatial distributions observed appear below
Electrons and Positrons after 2mm of LBE:
Electrons:
Positrons: