Difference between revisions of "Physics Faculty Meetings"
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
is engineering math. Each department is supposed to formulate their own requirements. Physics has not been participating | is engineering math. Each department is supposed to formulate their own requirements. Physics has not been participating | ||
in these meetings. Phil Cole volunteered to serve as our representative. | in these meetings. Phil Cole volunteered to serve as our representative. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
[[Physics]] | [[Physics]] | ||
Revision as of 20:15, 30 November 2015
Physics Faculty meeting minutes
2015
11/25/15
1.) IAC status (Jon Stoner):
*The IAC continues to work on isotope production of Cu-67 as well as isotopes for INL. Student opportunities exist involving the measurements of sample activities using a calibrated HpGe detector (counting analysis). A student may also find opportunities on the Niowave neutron source project. Alan Hunt may be interested in a studentfor DTRA work. CPI support may be available as well.
*Beam charges have increased due to the new indirect cost assessment policy.
*Despite our attempts at improving communication between faculty and the IAC, we seem to have missed a few potential opportunities. http://science.energy.gov/~/media/grants/pdf/foas/2016/SC_FOA_0001438.pdf http://science.energy.gov/~/media/grants/pdf/foas/2016/SC_FOA_0001432.pdf
The links are intended to give faculty some ideas when they search for FOAs.
*Faculty are encouraged to schedule their beam time during the late fall and winter months when beam time is more available.
2.) Class evaluations (Sandra O’Neil) :
Sandra discussed a proposal for student evaluations with Dave Rogers. Basically the plan is to return to the old system and have a paper record that is kept on file that becomes available to the faculty after grades have been submitted. There is no plan to produce a summary of the results but rather have the raw data available if needed for PPRs and promotions. Faculty will encourage the students to use the online system as well but evaluations during class time will be done to ensure student participation.
3.) Labs: (Kirsten Bernabee & Anna Hoskins) Kirsten and Anna reported that about $20k is needed to replace equipment ($10k for interfaces). A lab renovation proposal is in the works that would require about $40k. see attachment A below and Kirsten’s e-mail from November 20.
4.) We may have two open TA lines next semester. Sandra will inquire with the grad office to determine if there are grad student applications floating around.
5.) EAS Ph.D. :
Dan Dale reported that he met with Chikashi Sato to discuss the requirements for the Ph.D. in Engineering and Applied Science. Dr. Sato said that this committee has been meeting to discuss this, and the only common requirement at present is engineering math. Each department is supposed to formulate their own requirements. Physics has not been participating in these meetings. Phil Cole volunteered to serve as our representative.