Tamar AnalysisChapt - Revision history

Didbtama: /* Systematic errors */

2012-12-10T06:48:29Z

Systematic errors

2012-12-10T06:46:19Z

Systematic errors

2012-12-10T06:20:13Z

Systematic errors

2012-12-10T06:18:27Z

Fragmentation \Delta R_{np}^{\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}}

2012-12-10T06:04:26Z

Dilution Factor

2012-12-10T06:01:32Z

Semi-Inclusive Asymmetries

2012-12-10T05:23:43Z

Semi-Inclusive Asymmetries

2012-12-10T05:20:33Z

Beam Charge Asymmetry

2012-12-09T07:09:48Z

Electron Asymmetry

2012-12-09T06:32:44Z

Electron Asymmetry

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:48, 10 December 2012
Line 653:		Line 653:
	\|}<br>		\|}<br>

		+	[[Delta_D_over_D]]

	[https://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/SIDIS_PionAsym_EG2000 Go Back]		[https://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/SIDIS_PionAsym_EG2000 Go Back]

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:46, 10 December 2012
Line 652:		Line 652:
	\|The systematic errors for the <math>A_{NH_{3}}^{\pi^+}</math> asymmetry.		\|The systematic errors for the <math>A_{NH_{3}}^{\pi^+}</math> asymmetry.
	\|}<br>		\|}<br>
		+
		+
		+	[https://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/SIDIS_PionAsym_EG2000 Go Back]

@@ Line 651: / Line 651: @@
 |-
 |The systematic errors for the <math>A_{NH_{3}}^{\pi^+}</math> asymmetry.
-|]<br>
+|}<br>

@@ Line 575: / Line 575: @@
 {| border="0" style="background:transparent;"  align="center"
 |-
-|Calculated dilution Factor for NH$_{3}$ target type.
+|Calculated dilution Factor for NH<math>_{3}</math> target type.
 |}<br>
 The dilution factor is compared below in Table~\ref{tab:CompareDilution}:<br>
@@ Line 592: / Line 592: @@
 |{Dilution Factor compared with other results  \cite{Prok2004} \cite{Fersch2008}.
 |}<br>
-−
 ==Fragmentation <math>\Delta R_{np}^{\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}}</math>==

@@ Line 422: / Line 422: @@
 | ND<math>_{3}</math>, B>0, <math>\pi^{-}</math> || <math>-6.37 \pm 	188.73</math> || <math>-98.11 \pm 188.03</math> || <math> 9.21 \pm	127.22</math>
 |-
-| ND<math>_{3}</math>, B<0, <math>\pi^{-}</math> || <math>-63.73 \pm 105.14</math> || <math>-30.34 \pm	6085.54</math> || <math>12.37 \pm	71.10</math> |-
+| ND<math>_{3}</math>, B<0, <math>\pi^{-}</math> || <math>-63.73 \pm 105.14</math> || <math>-30.34 \pm	6085.54</math> || <math>12.37 \pm	71.10</math>
 | NH<math>_{3}</math>, B>0, <math>\pi^{-}</math> || <math>-155.45 \pm	128.21</math> || <math>-72.55 \pm	128.92</math> || <math> 35.11 \pm 90.91</math>
 |-

@@ Line 311: / Line 311: @@
 '''Figure 2.14.''' Beam charge asymmetry for run #28101 using the gated Faraday cup counts for two helicity pairs(1-4 and 2-3 helicity pairs).<math>A_{1-4}=(11.5 \pm 4.4) \times 10^{-5}</math> and <math>A_{2-3}=(-2.3 \pm  4.4) \times 10^{-5}</math>.
 |}<br>
- EG1b data sets, with the same half wave plane, target type, target polarization and beam torus, have been combined. The beam charge asymmetries have been calculated for the each run group and are listed in Table~\ref{tab:RunvsBeamAsym}.<br>
+EG1b data sets, with the same half wave plane, target type, target polarization and beam torus, have been combined. The beam charge asymmetries have been calculated for the each run group and are listed in Table~\ref{tab:RunvsBeamAsym}.<br>
 {| border="1" style="text-align: center;" align="center"
 |-

@@ Line 347: / Line 347: @@
 |-
+|
-[[NES_Asymmetry_Before_FCNormalization.png|400px]]
+[[File:NES_Asymmetry_Before_FCNormalization.png|400px]]
 |}<br>
 {| border="0" style="background:transparent;"  align="center"