Vanwdani: Created page with "File:MollerShieldDraftingView.png Images taken from cadBeamline/cadBeamlineFTOFF File:cadBeamlineFTon_Mathematica.pngFile:cadBeamlineFTOFF_Mathematica.png Dete..."

2018-10-27T15:51:13Z

Created page with "File:MollerShieldDraftingView.png Images taken from cadBeamline/cadBeamlineFTOFF File:cadBeamlineFTon_Mathematica.png File:cadBeamlineFTOFF_Mathematica.png Dete..."

New page

[[File:MollerShieldDraftingView.png]]

Images taken from cadBeamline/cadBeamlineFTOFF

[[File:cadBeamlineFTon_Mathematica.png]][[File:cadBeamlineFTOFF_Mathematica.png]]

Determining what the shield components are using Mathematica, gcards are modified to call Modified cadBeamline and cadBeamlineFTOFF files without the shield components.

FTOn_ShieldIn:

[[File:FTon_ShieldIn_MathematicaTest.png]]

FtOn_ShieldOut:

[[File:FTon_ShieldOut_MathematicaTest.png]]

FTOff_ShieldIn:

[[File:FTOff_ShieldIn_Mathematica_Test.png]]

FTOff_ShieldOut:

[[File:FToff_ShieldOut_Mathematica_Test.png]]

According to cad.gxml within cadBeamline:
For the FTON configurration the cone is shifted by -238.8mm

For integrating the rate within the shield area, this implies:
For the components of FTOff, starting at the cone-tip and running to the lead shield
<center><math> 458.2\ to\ 1799.3cm</math></center>

For the component of FTOn, starting at the main-cone (the only component)
<center><math>FTOn\ 458.2+103.0-23.8=537.4\ to\ 1420\ cm</math></center>

Determining and Verify Shield Limits - Revision history

Vanwdani: Created page with "File:MollerShieldDraftingView.png Images taken from cadBeamline/cadBeamlineFTOFF File:cadBeamlineFTon_Mathematica.pngFile:cadBeamlineFTOFF_Mathematica.png Dete..."