DOE Revue 913 - Revision history

Oborn: Protected "DOE Revue 913" ([edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) [move=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) [read=autoconfirmed] (indefinite))

2010-12-31T02:08:28Z

Protected "DOE Revue 913" ([edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) [move=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) [read=autoconfirmed] (indefinite))

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:08, 31 December 2010
(No difference)

Oborn at 17:16, 16 November 2009

2009-11-16T17:16:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:16, 16 November 2009
Line 21:		Line 21:
	4.) Reasonableness and appropriateness of the Budget		4.) Reasonableness and appropriateness of the Budget

			It was difficult to assess the reasonableness of the materials and supplies costs.
	The budget materials and supplies section would benefit from an itemized list of supplies and their costs for items beyond $10,000. In particular it is unclear how much a cryo pump system capable of < <math>10^{-12}</math> Torr would cost to implement.		The budget materials and supplies section would benefit from an itemized list of supplies and their costs for items beyond $10,000. In particular it is unclear how much a cryo pump system capable of < <math>10^{-12}</math> Torr would cost to implement.

Oborn at 17:13, 16 November 2009

2009-11-16T17:13:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:13, 16 November 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	1.) Scientific and/or technical merit of the project		1.) Scientific and/or technical merit of the project

			The proposal has substantial scientific merit. Increasing the gun high voltage is a clear step towards obtaining the objectives outlined in this proposal . The inverted gun geometry has been shown to at least allow a 3MV/m electric field gradient at the crystal surface when the gun voltage is 200 kV. It is important to note that such a gun routinely operated at 120 kV. The development of electrodes capable of 10MV/m is one possible mean to accomplish the proposals objectives. The proposal did not indicate what the potential was for the successful development of such electrodes.

	The scientific and technical merit of this proposal has the following weakness:		The scientific and technical merit of this proposal has the following weakness:

Oborn at 16:57, 16 November 2009

2009-11-16T16:57:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 16 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:

	Proposal Rating : 4/6		Proposal Rating : 4/6

	1.) Scientific and/or technical merit of the project		1.) Scientific and/or technical merit of the project

			The scientific and technical merit of this proposal has the following weakness:

	The proposal indicates that the NEG pumps are currently pumping down to pressures of <math>10^{-12}</math> Torr. The proposal identifies the limit of NEG pumps currently used in ultra high vacuum environments as a possible inhibitor to increasing the polarized electron current. The proposal did not indicate that cryo pumps can improve the vacuum. The typical cryo pump can easily go to <math>10^{-8}</math> and vendors advertise <math>10^{-9}</math> Torr. There are developments in the field which advertise <math>10^{-13}</math> Torr cryo pumps just as there are some advertising <math>10^{-13}</math> NEG pumps. The proposal would be improved by identifying a vacuum pumps which is proven to improve the vacuum by at least a factor of 10 over the current advertised limit of <math>10^{-12}</math> Torr.		The proposal indicates that the NEG pumps are currently pumping down to pressures of <math>10^{-12}</math> Torr. The proposal identifies the limit of NEG pumps currently used in ultra high vacuum environments as a possible inhibitor to increasing the polarized electron current. The proposal did not indicate that cryo pumps can improve the vacuum. The typical cryo pump can easily go to <math>10^{-8}</math> and vendors advertise <math>10^{-9}</math> Torr. There are developments in the field which advertise <math>10^{-13}</math> Torr cryo pumps just as there are some advertising <math>10^{-13}</math> NEG pumps. The proposal would be improved by identifying a vacuum pumps which is proven to improve the vacuum by at least a factor of 10 over the current advertised limit of <math>10^{-12}</math> Torr.

Oborn at 16:55, 16 November 2009

2009-11-16T16:55:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:55, 16 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:

			Proposal Rating : 4/6

	1.) Scientific and/or technical merit of the project		1.) Scientific and/or technical merit of the project

Line 15:		Line 18:
	4.) Reasonableness and appropriateness of the Budget		4.) Reasonableness and appropriateness of the Budget

	The budget materials and supplies section would benefit from an itemized list of supplies and their costs for items beyond $10,000. In particular it is unclear how much a cryo pump system capable of < 10^{-12} Torr would cost to implement.		The budget materials and supplies section would benefit from an itemized list of supplies and their costs for items beyond $10,000. In particular it is unclear how much a cryo pump system capable of < <math>10^{-12}</math> Torr would cost to implement.

	5.) Relevance to DOE mission		5.) Relevance to DOE mission

			The proposal will improve a well established DOE program at JLab. This is clearly a high priority in DOE's mission.

	6.) Leadership within the scientific community.		6.) Leadership within the scientific community.

	Jefferson Lab has been a world leader in the development of polarized electron sources. The source produces mA level currents which accelerated to GeV energies for use by international collaborations in many nuclear physics experimental programs. The demands of the nuclear physics program drive the accelerator to perform well beyond its original design. The proposed development of a higher current source is the next progressive step towards meeting the high demands of the nuclear physics program.		Jefferson Lab has been a world leader in the development of polarized electron sources. The source produces mA level currents which accelerated to GeV energies for use by international collaborations in many nuclear physics experimental programs. The demands of the nuclear physics program drive the accelerator to perform well beyond its original design. The proposed development of a higher current source is the next progressive step towards meeting the high demands of the nuclear physics program.

	~~5-6: Strongly encourage~~
	~~3-4: Encourage~~
	~~1-2: Discourage~~

Oborn at 16:52, 16 November 2009

2009-11-16T16:52:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:52, 16 November 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	2.) Appropriateness of the proposed method or approach		2.) Appropriateness of the proposed method or approach

	The proposal seeks to increase available beam current at JLab through changes to the current electron gun and investment in low vacuum pumping technologies. Both of these approaches are focused on improving the vacuum quality within the vacuum chamber. An additional area of research involves a partnership with JLab's SRF Institute for the purpose of improving the smoothness of the niobium electrodes. This is also aimed at improving the vacuum by reducing a potential source of contamination, hydrogen ions.		The proposal seeks to increase available beam current at JLab through changes to the current electron gun and investment in low vacuum pumping technologies. Both of these approaches are focused on improving the vacuum quality within the vacuum chamber. An additional area of research involves a partnership with JLab's SRF Institute for the purpose of improving the smoothness of the niobium electrodes. This is also aimed at improving the vacuum by reducing a potential source of contamination, hydrogen ions. There is every indication that vacuum is a key limiting factor in progressing towards the goal of higher beam currents. The proposal did not provide an indication that this barrier has the potential to be overcome. It may also be prudent to indicate why it is unfeasible to add a second electron gun source that can inject electrons simultaneously with the current gun.

	3.) Competency of Personnel		3.) Competency of Personnel

Oborn at 16:48, 16 November 2009

2009-11-16T16:48:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:48, 16 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	1.) Scientific and/or technical merit of the project		1.) Scientific and/or technical merit of the project

	The proposal identifies the ~~potential~~ limit of NEG pumps currently used in ultra high vacuum environments~~, there is no indication~~ that cryo pumps can improve the vacuum~~. The proposal indicates that the NEG pumps are currently pumping down to pressures of 10^{-12} Torr~~. The typical cryo pump can easily go to 10^{-8} and vendors advertise 10^{-9} Torr. There are developments in the field which advertise 10^{-13} Torr cryo pumps just as there are some advertising 10^{-13} NEG pumps. The proposal would be improved by identifying ~~the~~ pumps which ~~will~~ improve the vacuum by at least a factor of 10 over the current advertised limit of 10^{-12} Torr.		The proposal indicates that the NEG pumps are currently pumping down to pressures of <math>10^{-12}</math> Torr. The proposal identifies the limit of NEG pumps currently used in ultra high vacuum environments as a possible inhibitor to increasing the polarized electron current. The proposal did not indicate that cryo pumps can improve the vacuum. The typical cryo pump can easily go to <math>10^{-8}</math> and vendors advertise <math>10^{-9}</math> Torr. There are developments in the field which advertise <math>10^{-13}</math> Torr cryo pumps just as there are some advertising <math>10^{-13}</math> NEG pumps. The proposal would be improved by identifying a vacuum pumps which is proven to improve the vacuum by at least a factor of 10 over the current advertised limit of <math>10^{-12}</math> Torr.

Oborn at 15:47, 16 November 2009

2009-11-16T15:47:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 16 November 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:
	3.) Competency of Personnel		3.) Competency of Personnel

	The PI has a well established track record including almost 10 years of experience in JLab's injector group ~~which~~ has been ~~the~~ Deputy of for 5 years.		The PI has a well established track record including almost 10 years of experience in JLab's injector group. The PI has also been a Deputy for 5 years. The PI is more than competent to carry out the proposed work.

	4.) Reasonableness and appropriateness of the Budget		4.) Reasonableness and appropriateness of the Budget

Oborn at 15:45, 16 November 2009

2009-11-16T15:45:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:45, 16 November 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	2.) Appropriateness of the proposed method or approach		2.) Appropriateness of the proposed method or approach

			The proposal seeks to increase available beam current at JLab through changes to the current electron gun and investment in low vacuum pumping technologies. Both of these approaches are focused on improving the vacuum quality within the vacuum chamber. An additional area of research involves a partnership with JLab's SRF Institute for the purpose of improving the smoothness of the niobium electrodes. This is also aimed at improving the vacuum by reducing a potential source of contamination, hydrogen ions.

	3.) Competency of Personnel		3.) Competency of Personnel

Oborn at 01:56, 13 November 2009

2009-11-13T01:56:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:56, 13 November 2009
Line 14:		Line 14:
	4.) Reasonableness and appropriateness of the Budget		4.) Reasonableness and appropriateness of the Budget

	The budget materials and supplies section would benefit from an itemized list of supplies and their costs for items beyond $10,000. In particular it is unclear how much a ~~cryopumping~~ system capable of < 10^{-12} Torr would cost to implement.		The budget materials and supplies section would benefit from an itemized list of supplies and their costs for items beyond $10,000. In particular it is unclear how much a cryo pump system capable of < 10^{-12} Torr would cost to implement.

	5.) Relevance to DOE mission		5.) Relevance to DOE mission