Beam Test Jul 26 2012 - Revision history

Setisadi: /* DAQ runs */

2013-10-04T07:03:01Z

DAQ runs

Setisadi: /* DAQ runs */

2013-10-04T06:51:40Z

DAQ runs

Setisadi at 23:33, 17 August 2012

2012-08-17T23:33:46Z

Setisadi: /* DAQ runs */

2012-08-09T01:27:00Z

DAQ runs

Setisadi: /* DAQ runs */

2012-08-09T01:16:35Z

DAQ runs

Setisadi: /* DAQ runs */

2012-08-09T01:13:36Z

DAQ runs

Setisadi: /* Data Analysis */

2012-08-05T21:54:46Z

Data Analysis

Setisadi: /* Data Analysis */

2012-08-05T20:43:31Z

Data Analysis

Setisadi: /* Data Analysis */

2012-08-05T20:39:32Z

Data Analysis

Setisadi: /* comparing r3686 and r3687 */

2012-08-05T20:38:21Z

comparing r3686 and r3687

@@ Line 51: / Line 51: @@
 {| border="1"  |cellpadding="20" cellspacing="0
 |-
-|  run#  || T1 || T2 || Sweep Magnet|| logic || HV-D2L || HV-D1R || Reprate  || start || stop || Int Rate || run time
+|  run#  || T1 || T2 || Sweep Magnet|| logic || HV-D2L || HV-D1R || Reprate  || start || stop || Int Rate || run time || Total events
 |-
-|  3679  || in || in || out|| (DL & GunTrig) or (DR & GunTrig) || 1060V || 1080V || 100 || 08:48:00 || 09:28:01 || 42.3 events/s||  2401 s
+|  3679  || in || in || out|| (DL & GunTrig) or (DR & GunTrig) || 1060V || 1080V || 100 || 08:48:00 || 09:28:01 || 42.3 events/s||  2401 s || 101466
 |-
-|  3680  || in || OUT || out|| (DL & GunTrig) or (DR & GunTrig) || 1060V || 1080V || 100 || 09:29:37 || 09:46:19 || 42.6 events/s|| 1002 s
+|  3680  || in || OUT || out|| (DL & GunTrig) or (DR & GunTrig) || 1060V || 1080V || 100 || 09:29:37 || 09:46:19 || 42.6 events/s|| 1002 s || 42596
 |-
 |}

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:51, 4 October 2013
Line 48:		Line 48:

	TDC CH5 was a delay of (32+16+8+4+2+1+0.5)+ (16+8+4+2+1+0.5) = 95 nano second.		TDC CH5 was a delay of (32+16+8+4+2+1+0.5)+ (16+8+4+2+1+0.5) = 95 nano second.
		+
		+	{\| border="1" \|cellpadding="20" cellspacing="0
		+	\|-
		+	\| run# \|\| T1 \|\| T2 \|\| Sweep Magnet\|\| logic \|\| HV-D2L \|\| HV-D1R \|\| Reprate \|\| start \|\| stop \|\| Int Rate \|\| run time
		+	\|-
		+	\| 3679 \|\| in \|\| in \|\| out\|\| (DL & GunTrig) or (DR & GunTrig) \|\| 1060V \|\| 1080V \|\| 100 \|\| 08:48:00 \|\| 09:28:01 \|\| 42.3 events/s\|\| 2401 s
		+	\|-
		+	\| 3680 \|\| in \|\| OUT \|\| out\|\| (DL & GunTrig) or (DR & GunTrig) \|\| 1060V \|\| 1080V \|\| 100 \|\| 09:29:37 \|\| 09:46:19 \|\| 42.6 events/s\|\| 1002 s
		+	\|-
		+	\|}

	{\| border="1" \|cellpadding="20" cellspacing="0		{\| border="1" \|cellpadding="20" cellspacing="0

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:33, 17 August 2012
Line 44:		Line 44:

	= DAQ runs =		= DAQ runs =
		+
		+	2 MeV positron energy.

	TDC CH5 was a delay of (32+16+8+4+2+1+0.5)+ (16+8+4+2+1+0.5) = 95 nano second.		TDC CH5 was a delay of (32+16+8+4+2+1+0.5)+ (16+8+4+2+1+0.5) = 95 nano second.

@@ Line 55: / Line 55: @@
 |  3680  || in || OUT || out|| (DL & GunTrig) or (DR & GunTrig) || 1060V || 1080V || 100 || 09:29:37 || 09:46:19 || 42.6 events/s|| ADC12 has Sintilator1 (Sint @ exit of 90 deg).
 |-
-|  3682  || in || OUT || out|| (DL & GunTrig) AND (DR & GunTrig) || 1150V || 1150V || 100 || 09:55:20 || 10:33:56 (2138 s) || 4.8884 events/s|| TDC cable was upside down, now it is flipped. Sintilator left was put to CH9.
+|  3682  || in || OUT || out|| (DL & GunTrig) AND (DR & GunTrig) || 1150V || 1150V || 100 || 09:55:20 || 10:33:56 (2316 s) || 4.8884 events/s|| TDC cable was upside down, now it is flipped. Sintilator left was put to CH9.
 |-
 |  3683  || in || IN || out|| (DL & GunTrig) AND (DR & GunTrig) || 1150V || 1150V || 100 || 10:36:03 || 10:53:48 (1065 s) || 5.9397 events/s|| TDC5->beam left

@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 |  3682  || in || OUT || out|| (DL & GunTrig) AND (DR & GunTrig) || 1150V || 1150V || 100 || 09:55:20 || 10:33:56 (2138 s) || 4.8884 events/s|| TDC cable was upside down, now it is flipped. Sintilator left was put to CH9.
 |-
-|  3683  || in || IN || out|| (DL & GunTrig) AND (DR & GunTrig) || 1150V || 1150V || 100 || 10:36:03 || 10:53:48 || 5.9397 events/s|| TDC5->beam left
+|  3683  || in || IN || out|| (DL & GunTrig) AND (DR & GunTrig) || 1150V || 1150V || 100 || 10:36:03 || 10:53:48 (1065 s) || 5.9397 events/s|| TDC5->beam left
 |-
-|  3684  || in || IN || out|| (DL & GunTrig) AND (DR & GunTrig) || 1150V || 1150V || 100 || 10:54:19 || 11:25:01 || 8.7974 events/s|| TDC3->beam right, TDC5->beam left
+|  3684  || in || IN || out|| (DL & GunTrig) AND (DR & GunTrig) || 1150V || 1150V || 100 || 10:54:19 || 11:25:01 (1842 s)|| 8.7974 events/s|| TDC3->beam right, TDC5->beam left
 |-
 |  3685  || in || out || out|| (DL & GunTrig) AND (DR & GunTrig) || 1150V || 1150V || 100 || 11:26:43 || 11:31:01 || 18 events/s|| junk, rate are too high.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 5 August 2012
Line 103:		Line 103:

	r3690 and r3691: [[HRRL_Pos_Test_26Jul2012_Data_Ana_com_r3688_r3689]]		r3690 and r3691: [[HRRL_Pos_Test_26Jul2012_Data_Ana_com_r3688_r3689]]
		+
		+	Subtracted Sepctrums: [[HRRL_Pos_Test_26Jul2012_Data_Ana_Sub_Spcs]]

	= Detector Calibrations =		= Detector Calibrations =

@@ Line 98: / Line 98: @@
 == Data Analysis ==
-[[HRRL_Pos_Test_26Jul2012_Data_Ana_com_r3686_r3687]]
+r3686 and r3687: [[HRRL_Pos_Test_26Jul2012_Data_Ana_com_r3686_r3687]]
-[[HRRL_Pos_Test_26Jul2012_Data_Ana_com_r3688_r3689]]
+r3688 and r3689: [[HRRL_Pos_Test_26Jul2012_Data_Ana_com_r3688_r3689]]
 = Detector Calibrations =

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:38, 5 August 2012
Line 99:		Line 99:

	[[HRRL_Pos_Test_26Jul2012_Data_Ana_com_r3686_r3687]]		[[HRRL_Pos_Test_26Jul2012_Data_Ana_com_r3686_r3687]]
−
−	~~===comparing r3686 and r3687===~~
−
−	~~{\| border="1"~~
−	~~\| NaI right \|\| [[File:hrrl_pos_26jul2012_data_ana_comp_r3686_r3687_DR2.png \| 100 px]]~~
−	\|-
−	~~\| NaI left \|\| [[File:hrrl_pos_26jul2012_data_ana_comp_r3686_r3687_DL2.png \| 100 px]]~~
−
−	\|-
−	~~\| NaI right: in - out \|\| [[File:hrrl_pos_26jul2012_data_ana_comp_r3686_r3687_sub.png \| 100 px]] [[File:hrrl_pos_26jul2012_data_ana_comp_r3686_r3687_sub_511.png \| 100 px]]~~
−
−	\|-
−	~~\| NaI left: in - out \|\| [[File:hrrl_pos_26jul2012_data_ana_comp_r3686_r3687_sub_L.png \| 100 px]] [[File:hrrl_pos_26jul2012_data_ana_comp_r3686_r3687_sub_L_511.png \| 100 px]]~~
−
−	\|-
−	\|}
−
−	~~==== e+ rate ====~~
−
−
−	~~e+ rate on right: 0.3619 Hz~~
−
−	~~e+ rate on left: 0.05706 Hz~~
−
−	~~==== Rough e- rate estimate ====~~
−
−	~~<math> I = \frac{Q}{t} = \frac{V}{R}</math>, so <math> Q = \frac{Vt}{R}</math>~~
−
−	~~According to: [[https://wiki.iac.isu.edu/index.php/Beam_Test_Jul_27_2012#Beam_Current_Calibration_of_Scint_Left_2 Calibration]]~~
−
−	~~<math>Vt = 1.201~\mu Vs</math>~~
−
−	~~<math> Q = \frac{1.201~\mu Vs}{50 \Omega }</math> = 24.02 nC~~
−
−	~~Electron charges per second under 100 Hz reprate is: 100Q/s = 2402 nC/s.~~
−
−	~~Unit charge: <math>1.602 \times 10^{-19}</math>C.~~
−
−	~~Number of electrons per second: <math>\frac{2402~nC/s }{1.602 \times 10^{-19}~C} = 1.5 \times 10^{13} </math> Hz.~~
−
−
−	~~==== e+/e- ratio ====~~
−
−	~~Right: <math>\frac{0.3619~Hz }{1.5 \times 10^{13} ~Hz } = 0.24 \times 10^{-13} = 2.4 \times 10^{-14} </math>~~
−
−	~~Left: <math>\frac{0.05706~Hz }{1.5 \times 10^{13} ~Hz } = 0.038 \times 10^{-13} = 3.8 \times 10^{-15} </math>~~
−
−
−	~~You need to require 511s in both detectors using a software cut.~~
−
−	~~Software cut? What kind of software cut?~~

	===comparing r3688 and r3689===		===comparing r3688 and r3689===