2NCorr Forward Detectors - Revision history

Burgjeff at 18:04, 22 February 2018

2018-02-22T18:04:09Z

Burgjeff at 22:01, 14 February 2018

2018-02-14T22:01:10Z

Burgjeff at 21:59, 14 February 2018

2018-02-14T21:59:54Z

Burgjeff at 21:57, 14 February 2018

2018-02-14T21:57:44Z

Burgjeff at 21:50, 14 February 2018

2018-02-14T21:50:53Z

Burgjeff at 21:38, 14 February 2018

2018-02-14T21:38:43Z

Burgjeff: Created page with " go back go back"

2018-02-14T21:37:09Z

Created page with " go back go back"

New page

[[Production Analysis| go back]]

[[Production Analysis| go back]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Production Analysis| go back]]
 There were concerns over the usefulness of events in the forward detectors, since there is no separation between photons and neutrons in the ToF spectrum. However, any accidentals, whether they are a result of noise, neutrons, photons, ect, can be subtracted out of the data by using the different pulse data. In order to check if reasonable results can be extracted from events in the forward detectors, I looked at the two-neutron opening angle distributions with the requirement that one of the neutrons was detected by detector 30, and detector 330. Both forward detectors produce an opening angle distribution that is quit similar to the distribution produced by the rest of the detector array. The inclusion of both forward detectors brought the number of two-neutron coincidence events from 2917 to 4506, or a 50% increase in statistics.
 [[File:2NCorrForwardDetCompare.png|650px]]
@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 [[Production Analysis| go back]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Production Analysis| go back]]
-There were concerns over the usefulness of events in the forward detectors, since there is no separation between photons and neutrons in the ToF spectrum. However, any accidentals, whether they are a result of noise, neutrons, photons, ect, can be subtracted out of the data by using the different pulse data. In order to check if reasonable results can be extracted from events in the forward detectors, I looked at the two-neutron opening angle distributions with the requirement that one of the neutrons was detected by detector 30, and detector 330. Both forward detectors produce an opening angle distribution that is quit similar to the distribution produced by the rest of the detector array. Including the two forward detectors brings the number of two-neutron coincidences from 2917 to 4506, or a 50% increase in statistics.
+There were concerns over the usefulness of events in the forward detectors, since there is no separation between photons and neutrons in the ToF spectrum. However, any accidentals, whether they are a result of noise, neutrons, photons, ect, can be subtracted out of the data by using the different pulse data. In order to check if reasonable results can be extracted from events in the forward detectors, I looked at the two-neutron opening angle distributions with the requirement that one of the neutrons was detected by detector 30, and detector 330. Both forward detectors produce an opening angle distribution that is quit similar to the distribution produced by the rest of the detector array. The inclusion of both forward detectors brought the number of two-neutron coincidence events from 2917 to 4506, or a 50% increase in statistics.
 [[File:2NCorrForwardDetCompare.png|650px]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Production Analysis| go back]]
-There were concerns over the usefulness of events in the forward detectors, since there is no separation between photons and neutrons in the ToF spectrum. However, all accidentals, whether a result of noise, neutrons, photons, ect, can be subtracted out by using the different pulse data. In order to check if reasonable results can be extracted from events in the forward detectors, I looked at the two-neutron opening angle distributions with the requirement that one of the neutrons was detected by detector 30, and detector 330. The result is a opening angle distribution that is quit similar to the distribution produced by the rest of the detector array. Including the two forward detectors brings the number of two-neutron coincidences from 2917 to 4506, or a 50% increase in statistics.
+There were concerns over the usefulness of events in the forward detectors, since there is no separation between photons and neutrons in the ToF spectrum. However, any accidentals, whether they are a result of noise, neutrons, photons, ect, can be subtracted out of the data by using the different pulse data. In order to check if reasonable results can be extracted from events in the forward detectors, I looked at the two-neutron opening angle distributions with the requirement that one of the neutrons was detected by detector 30, and detector 330. Both forward detectors produce an opening angle distribution that is quit similar to the distribution produced by the rest of the detector array. Including the two forward detectors brings the number of two-neutron coincidences from 2917 to 4506, or a 50% increase in statistics.
 [[File:2NCorrForwardDetCompare.png|650px]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Production Analysis| go back]]
-There were concerns over the usefulness of events in the forward detectors, since there is no separation between photons and neutrons in the ToF spectrum. However, all accidentals, whether a result of noise, neutrons, photons, ect, can be subtracted out by using the different pulse data. In order to check if reasonable results can be extracted from events in the forward detectors, I looked at the two-neutron opening angle distributions with the requirement that one of the neutrons was detected by detector 30, and detector 330. The result is a opening angle distribution that is quit similar to the distribution produced by the rest of the detector array.
+There were concerns over the usefulness of events in the forward detectors, since there is no separation between photons and neutrons in the ToF spectrum. However, all accidentals, whether a result of noise, neutrons, photons, ect, can be subtracted out by using the different pulse data. In order to check if reasonable results can be extracted from events in the forward detectors, I looked at the two-neutron opening angle distributions with the requirement that one of the neutrons was detected by detector 30, and detector 330. The result is a opening angle distribution that is quit similar to the distribution produced by the rest of the detector array. Including the two forward detectors brings the number of two-neutron coincidences from 2917 to 4506, or a 50% increase in statistics.
 [[File:2NCorrForwardDetCompare.png|650px]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Production Analysis| go back]]
-In order to check if reasonable data can be extracted from the forward detectors.
+There were concerns over the usefulness of events in the forward detectors, since there is no separation between photons and neutrons in the ToF spectrum. However, all accidentals, whether a result of noise, neutrons, photons, ect, can be subtracted out by using the different pulse data. In order to check if reasonable results can be extracted from events in the forward detectors, I looked at the two-neutron opening angle distributions with the requirement that one of the neutrons was detected by detector 30, and detector 330. The result is a opening angle distribution that is quit similar to the distribution produced by the rest of the detector array.
 [[File:2NCorrForwardDetCompare.png|650px]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:38, 14 February 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Production Analysis\| go back]]		[[Production Analysis\| go back]]

		+	In order to check if reasonable data can be extracted from the forward detectors.

−		+	[[File:2NCorrForwardDetCompare.png\|650px]]